Avoiding Breach of Contract When Time Is of the
In the construction business, the phrase “time is
of the essence” is far more than a cliché
This article appeared in the September 2002 issue of "The Construction Advisor"
published by Lang Baker & Klain, PLC.
Free Subscription to the Construction Advisor
Construction Advisor index
Do you have a quick question about this topic? Call Mike
Thal (480-947-1911) for a no-charge, five-minute phone consultation
In writing or not, “time
is of the essence” places specific obligations on the contractor and
subcontractors that, if not fulfilled, could hold grave legal and financial
provision is a powerful weapon, since it can give an otherwise minor delay the
legal effect of a material breach of contract.
The difference between a
minor and material breach can be enormous. While the victim of a minor or
partial breach can recover whatever loss the minor breach has caused him, he is
still obligated to fulfill his part of the contract. But the victim of a
material or total breach is excused from further performance, and the party who
breached the contract may be booted off of the job and held liable for costly
What Is Time of the
completion will warrant termination and remedies depends partly on the contract
language. But even where time-of-essence language does not appear in the
contract, the courts may interpret the conduct and communication of the parties
as creating a de facto agreement that, indeed, time was of the essence.
contractors and subs trying to meet a deadline, the Arizona Supreme Court has
ruled that a time-of-essence provision is merely one factor to be considered
when determining if a breach is material. The mere indication that “time is of
the essence” generally will not transform trivial un-timeliness into a material
For example, the Arizona
Supreme Court has held, in Foundation Development Corp. v. Loehmann’s, Inc.,
that if failure of performance at the exact time will not cause injury, time
cannot be absolutely “of the essence,” even though, technically, the delay
constitutes a breach of the contract.
Despite these apparent
safety nets, you should carefully read the contract for language stating that
“time is of the essence” and carefully consider whether you or the owner has
treated time as of the essence. Here are some indications that time may be of
the phrase “time is of the essence” appears somewhere in the contract documents,
the owner has insisted on performance of some element by a specific date,
the owner has requested that you or your subs devote more resources to
the contractor or subcontractor has promised completion by a certain date,
the owner will suffer
damages if completion is not made by a specific date, or
the owner intends to
make use of the property by a specific date.
Avoiding Delay Damages
Where time has been made
of the essence to a contract, you will want to monitor changes to the schedule
with extra care and at frequent intervals. Always utilize change orders and
written extensions to permit delays, and allow for modifications to extend time
in the contract documents.
Monitoring will help you
readjust scheduling to meet the deadline. If a project should fall irretrievably
behind schedule, monitoring will help you predict the delay and bring it to the
owner’s attention in time to modify the agreement to extend the time for
In addition, each written
change order will give the owner notice that the change will delay the project.
That notification may avoid disputes (or strengthen your position in case a
dispute arises), serving as a record that the owner agreed to a later completion
Before you even begin a
project, be sure that the contract provides for extensions of time to complete
the project for added work, weather delays and other obstacles beyond your